Cut Or Uncut, The San Francisco Anti Circumcision Campaign Goes Anti-Jewish

It was once dismissed as something that can only happen in the Freak Show aka San Francisco. But the attempt to ban male circumcision is real. And has taken the clear anti-Jewish slant many believed that it was all along.
All that it took to get this on an actual voting ballot this November was 7,700 signatures.
Yeah, there are 7,700 freaks in the Freak Show that think that snipping a little bit of a male baby's foreskin is the end of the planet as we know it.
Before I continue, FTR, I had the procedure done when I was a baby. OH, DA HORROR! I soooo remember the snip, snip!
Please!
Yet in the linked article, one of the major pushers of this absolute junk science, Lloyd Schofield, claims that it is a painful and dangerous procedure. You know, you have read sooo many cases of snipping gone bad. And Mr. Schofield claims that it is not in the best interests of the male child.
Most doctors have no problem doing the procedure. In fact, many believe that the benefits outweigh the minimal risks of performing the procedure on a male infant. In fact, there is science that backs up the fact that men have less penis problems as they live their lives out. And it has been studied that men that have been snipped are less likely to have urinary tract problems than those not snipped.
Now in this overall link on the subject-may not be safe to read at work-there is a couple of comparison photos of a circumcised penis over the non-circumcised one. Sorry, the cut just looks better than the uncut. It looks cleaner and not as gross as the uncut one.
But, there are some sane voices such as San Francisco Chronicle columnist Debra Saunders who points out that this is on the surface a general trend of the, as she calls it, Special City.
OK, now that I spent way too much time on the background, I really have wondered why for some this is a real issue.
Well, methinks it has to do with religion.
Particularly. . .the J O O O S!
Yes, the eeeeevvviiiiilllll J O O O S!
You know, those snipping rabbis have been praciting the barbaric, barbaric I tell you, procedure for, oh about 5,000 years. Yeah, it is really important to the J O O O S that male babies be circumcised for faith reasons.
As you read the link, surprisingly to me, the procedure is something that is encouraged in Islam. And there is nothing specific for or against in most Christian churches. Many American Christian males may or may not be snipped. But if so, it is not really for religious reasons.
But now the campaign for banning the practice outright in San Francisco for males under 18 years old has taken the ugly turn.
Zombie over at Pajamas Media has the goods on the blatant anti-Jewish nature of the campaign to ban male children circumcision.
For those that do not know, Zombie is a resident of the Freak Show, Special City, what ever any wants to call San Francisco nowadays.
Under the title of Foreskin Man-I kid you not-a rather buff, blond, Aryan looking fellow goes after the eeeeevvviiiiilllll rabbi, also known as a mohel, for daring to carry out the ritual of circumcision.
Again, credit also goes to Miss Saunders for exposing this vile anti-Jewish literature.
Really, is the best case against something that opponents believe is a bad thing? Is it really helping their so-called cause any depicting rabbis as evil?
It is if the real message is hatred for Jews.
And that is what I have come to believe this is really all about.
It is not about science. It is not about what the shlong looks like, cut or uncut. It is certainly not a gay-rights issue.
It is a back-door way of sticking it to the eeeeevvviiiiilllll J O O O S and one of the most sacred religious practices.
Over at The Other McCain, there is a quote from Da Tech Guy that I believe says it all:

“That I would see something like this in an American city while survivors of the ovens are still alive is obscene.”

Enough said.