Preaching The Gospel Of The Democrat Party From The Pulpit

As an Episcopalian, many days barely, what my local bishop is pushing this Sunday's preachers to support the California Nightmare, er "Dream" Act is beyond offensive and not a Christian thing to do.
Bishop Jon Bruno has delivered his pronouncement from on high that the preachers need to preach on the so-called "Dream" Act that awaits California Gov. Jerry Brown's signature.
Why?
Since when shall preachers promote a clear agenda of the California Democrat party?
Well, since this is the whim of the bishop, I guess.
The background on the "Dream" act is simple.
It will allow the children of illegal aliens to access higher education by paying in-state tuitions instead of at the very least out-of-state tuitions.
And I am sorry, but this is a benefit at the expense of American students and is discriminatory at the least.
Why should a person that is in the United States, California in particular, get a benefit over a equally deserving potential student say from Colorado? Why should said student not pay the out-of-state tuition? After all, they are not legal, right?
But, many on the left want you to believe that this is a civil rights issue.
The dirty fact is that higher education is not a right. And it is something that not everyone can or should have.
I do not want to deny these good students the access to the higher education. If they are trying to do the right thing and become citizens, great. Until that happens, they are not and can not be treated as such. Especially at a time when all we hear from the higher educrats is how they are hurting for money.
You know, these students can do what many of us did.
They can work while going to school. Remember, they are doing two things. Trying to get a higher education and become American citizens. At the very least, these are people that can and should have a work visa and or a green card while they go through the process to become citizens. So they can have the ability to work while going through school.
Now, I ask again, why is the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles blatantly backing extremely partisan legislation?
I suppose it is a combination of "social justice" and being for the underdog.
But, this does come at a price and a cost to just as deserving Americans that have the misfortune of not being California residents. And, it is a magnet for other illegals to come to California, face no consequence for their action, have children and they can eventually benefit from this bad legislation.
The sad fact is if this legislation is signed, the real underdogs will be the American students that will compete for slots against illegal alien students.
Where will the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles be for them?
I believe that I hear crickets chirping on that.
And the other reality is that not all of us that are Christian and members of the Episcopal church support this legislation. On this, my bishop does not speak for me. Nor does my preacher if he or she chooses to preach on the justification of this legislation.
And what is this doing spreading the message of the Gospel? Is this bringing anyone to Jesus Christ?
I leave you with that question.
But I do not support the bishop and those in the Diocese of Los Angeles that support the so-called "Dream" act. For it will be a nightmare, not a dream, for most Americans and Californians.

More Arrogance From The Christian Modernists

I write this post because it highlights the total arrogance of those who are the Christian modernists or liberals http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/rds_search/ci_9450154?IADID=Search-www.pasadenastarnews.com-www.pasadenastarnews.com?source=sb-google.
Once you read the link, I want to highlight the following comment:

He called the plan's rejection a "slap in the face" to a church that's been deeply involved in city social programs, incubating such agencies as the AIDS Service Center, Union Station and Young & Healthy.

The "he" is the rector of Pasadena, California's All Saints Episcopal Church, the Rev. Ed Bacon. All Saints, also known as All Socialists, is one of the most Modernist churches in the Episcopal church. The Rev. Bacon is right down the line a Christian Modernist. You know, basically adopting the Democrat platform. It is here that, unless the California supreme court stays it's decision, the first Christian "same-sex wedding" will take place.
Why am I bothered?
Because, the Rev. Bacon did not get what he wanted. An expansion of the church has not passed two planning commissions. So, his reaction sounds a lot like he and All Saints (Socialists) should just be rewarded because they are All Saints (Socialists). The implication is that All Saints (Socialists) does what it does as a quid pro quo. The Rev. Bacon reaction is that because it is All Saints (Socialists), the city of Pasadena should just bend over and let them do what they want.
To me, the Rev. Bacon has not reacted in the Christian way. So, maybe a scale back or a compromise that would please the planning commissions would be the way to go.
Trust me, folks. Pasadena is a very crowded city and land is at a premium. When a house on a large lot is sold, it often becomes a set of condominiums or town homes.
Maybe the project is too grandiose for the area where All Saints (Socialists) is. Knowing the area, that seems to be right.
A little humility would go a long way to a compromise and a way to work with its neighbors. That is the real message of Christianity. Not whining like a child when not getting one's own way.